Anna Chapman Video

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

The Obama Surge Continues: Guns are a big seller on Black Friday

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Operation Hackerazzi

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Someone at Vanity Fair is not paying attention in regard to the Tea Party

The Tea Party Is Revolting | VF Daily | Vanity Fair:
by Matt Pressman
February 9, 2011, 7:50 AM

"The Tea Party’s first major legislative revolt against the Republican establishment has come over…an extension of the Patriot Act? Well, the founding fathers didn’t say anything about monitoring citizens based on the library books they check out, so therefore it must be unconstitutional. [Washington Post]"

Matt, sweetie, why the question mark of surprise? Were you under the impression that the Tea Party only liked the parts of the Constitution that you hate? Sorry to bust your hat bubble, the Tea Party is all about the Constitution and their supporters typically read it.  You know, like what happened on the floor of the House of Representatives a few weeks ago.  The country club Republicans that think they are in charge might have just been doing an appeasement stunt then, but this is real action. Really, I tried to use small words for you.

From the WaPo (see? still trying to help you, babe) story, it looks like Paul Kane and Felicia Sonmez have the same confusion that you do -

Patriot Act extension fails in the House by seven votes:

By Paul Kane and Felicia Sonmez

Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, February 8, 2011; 9:21 PM

Country Club Republicans

Hey kids! I'm Suki, from outside the beltway, and I am here to help.

House Republicans suffered an embarrassing setback Tuesday when they fell seven votes short of extending provisions of the Patriot Act, a vote that served as the first small uprising of the party's tea-party bloc.

That should read "House Republican Leaders" suffered a setback. Oh, you modified it a little with "embarrassing". Try this: "House Country Club Republicans were reminded who is in charge now"  . . .

The bill to reauthorize key parts of the counter-terrorism surveillance law, which expire at the end of the month, required a super-majority to pass under special rules reserved for non-controversial measures.

That part was nice. Keep it.

But it fell short of the required two-thirds after 26 Republicans bucked their leadership, eight of them freshman lawmakers elected in November's midterm elections. With most Democrats opposing the extension, the final tally was 277 members in favor of extension, and 148 opposed.
The Republicans who control the House made plans to bring the measure back for a quick vote later this month under normal rules, requiring only a simple majority for passage. They blamed House Democrats for the bill's downfall, noting that they provided the lion's share of votes against a bill that President Obama supports.

Here country club Republicans, use some of this.

I notice your quotes, much farther down, for the Republicans blaming the Democrats are from Republican leaders of the country club variety.  "Bucked their leadership"? Really now? Those border on racially charged words, especially since the Democrats voted in an almost solid, minority block against the President's wishes (just between us, he is a Democrat and leads their party). Fresh back from a Common Cause meeting? Just kidding! I do not engage in the baseless smears that 'professional journalists' are paid for.

The vote was the latest signal, though, that on certain matters House leaders could face a sizable resistance to compromise from within their own ranks, both from the 87 GOP freshmen and from conservative veterans who have been emboldened by the newcomers. 

 Yea! You actually distinguish the "House Leaders" from "Republicans" as a group!

Earlier Tuesday, House Republicans pulled a bill to extend assistance to workers who lose jobs due to competition from imports. Conservatives had complained that the bill would put the federal government too squarely into the private economy.

And leaders of the Appropriations Committee heard complaints Tuesday from fellow Republicans on the panel that their bill to slash at least $32 billion in fiscal year 2011 spending was insufficient. 

I hope this was not a surprise to you two. Maybe it was, but by the time you got this far you used up your quota of surprise words.

The Patriot Act measure would have extended through the end of the year three provisions that are set to expire Feb. 28. One authorizes the FBI to use roving wiretaps on surveillance targets; the second allows the government to access "any tangible items," such as library records, in the course of surveillance; and the third allows for the surveillance of targets who are not connected to an identified terrorist group.

Do you research any of this stuff?  The FBI can still do all of those things with a court order or warrant. You know, like the 4th Amendment allows the government to do. Um, you know the Constitution is not a "you can do" list for the citizens, it is a "you are allowed to" list for the government, right?

Democrats hailed the day's events under a press release from Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's office asking a simple question: "Disarray?"

Nice! The first quote of the story showcases Nancy Pelosi's Stalinist view of dissent in one word.

Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio), who has presented an occasionally lonely opposition to the Patriot Act, said that Tuesday's vote demonstrated that he now had company from more than two dozen Republicans who support the Bill of Rights. "The Patriot Act represents the undermining of civil liberties," Kucinich said after the vote. Republicans "brought [the bill] forward not knowing the votes."

See? Even that little man from Mars understands this bit of Tea Party goodness.

House leaders rejected that analysis. "Democrats in Congress voted to deny their own administration's request for key weapons in the war on terror," said Erica Elliott, spokeswoman for Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).

 Your editor either started or stopped reading before that paragraph. Leaders were distinguished from "Republicans" again.

A large majority of the freshman Republicans did support the extension of the law, which the last GOP president, George W. Bush, staunchly supported. Even some who wavered eventually decided to support the bill.

Invoking the president who inspired the Tea Party to begin forming is not helping the truthfulness aspect of your story, if that matters.  Oh, I forgot, "truthieness" is what matters to you people.

Rep. Steve Southerland (R-Fla.), a freshman who voted yes, said the measure is "going to need some examination going forward, so all I did today is just, hey, instead of making a wrong decision, we're just going to do a little more due diligence to make the very right decision to both protect our security as well as protect the civil liberties of the American people."

If he voted for extension, then he really does not understand and should be hearing from the Tea Party segment of his constituency for a while.

Contemplation goes with reading.

"This is just a temporary extension, so the Judiciary Committee can dive a little deeper into the details," said Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), a second-term lawmaker closely aligned with tea party activists. "That seemed fair. I don't want to let it expire without giving it full contemplation." 

Maybe you have no idea what a great public service you are doing.  That one needs a targeted message too. Something like "hey Jason, you needed to contemplate before that vote."

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who sponsored the extension, told reporters after the vote that opposition had little to do with the particular provisions being considered Tuesday and more to do with other counter-terrorism tools that have received scrutiny. "People didn't understand it," he said. "A lot of the complaints that we heard were about sections [of the law] not in this bill."

 Another reporter missed opportunity. Three parts to complain about were listed in this article above (find FBI).

The White House said in a statement Tuesday that it "does not object" to extending the three Patriot Act provisions until December. However, it added, the administration "would strongly prefer" an extension until December 2013, noting that the longer timeline "provides the necessary certainty and predictability" that law enforcement agencies require while at the same time ensuring that Congress can continue to review the law's effectiveness.

 Well give me a case of the vapors! Obama wants to be emperor and secure it into the empire of his successor.

The Senate is considering three competing timelines, in addition to the House legislation. Among them are proposals that would permanently extend the three provisions or extend them through 2013.

Readers, your helpful list of which Senators need a phone call, in addition to your own, is right here.

Now bring on the EPA and carbon rationing!

Femdom Cave - Adult Literature for the Discerning Reader
Read Controlling Sarah free at Literotica.Com

Now only 99¢

ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS
Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2011, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

Blago's attorneys seek missing phone call with Rahm Emanuel

Then White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

No wonder UPI is in the shape they are in. One of the allegedly missing phone calls is supposed to be with Rahm Emanuel. UPI is the only news org that does not mention this.

Blago's attorneys seek missing phone call - UPI.com:

Former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich

"CHICAGO, Feb. 8 (UPI) -- Attorneys for former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich asked a federal judge to order prosecutors to produce records of two phone calls lawyers claim went missing.

In their motion, Blagojevich's attorneys said the calls support their client's claim he is innocent of charges he tried to sell President Barack Obama's U.S. Senate seat after the November 2008 election, WMAQ-TV, Chicago, reported Tuesday."

Christina Filiggi of WLS-AM 890, in her Sailor Suit

Femdom Cave - Adult Literature for the Discerning Reader
Read Controlling Sarah free at Literotica.Com


ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS
Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2011, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

Senate Panel Finds Fort Hood Shooting Could Have Been Prevented

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Backpack Incendiary Bomb Found on MLK Day Parade Route

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

U.S. says iPad users' data stolen, sets criminal charges

1/18/2011: I got this story a little wrong. OK, way wrong. The criminal part is a group that were getting email addresses (possible access to accounts too) of iPad/3G users and not a story about getting 3G access without paying.


From the Beat Week Psychic Network on 1 January, 2011 this predictive commentary:
Unified: why iPad 2 could lose wifi-only model and benefit in process

The most logical explanation for the artificially inflated price tag on the iPad 3G is that AT&T wanted it that way. The 3G antenna doesn’t actually come with the ability to use it unless you pay $15 to $25 per month. The correct path would have been for all iPads to have the 3G antenna built in, and users could opt to pay for it if they want. But AT&T must have feared that hackers would buy the iPad and hack the 3G into working for free, so they insisted Apple make two separate iPad models, with the 3G enabled model overpriced and AT&T somehow getting a cut of it up front? That way AT&T got compensated even if a hacker did figure put how to get monthly 3G access for free. So why might this nonsense end in the iPad 2 era? Because AT&T no longer wears the pants in the Apple-AT&T relationship.

Today, January 18, 2011 from Reuters:

U.S. says iPad users' data stolen, sets criminal charges | Reuters:

"(Reuters) - U.S. investigators plan to announce criminal charges concerning the alleged theft of email addresses and other personal information belonging to about 120,000 users of Apple Inc's iPad tablet computer.

Prosecutors said the charges arise from an alleged hacking of AT&T Inc's servers, which affected iPad users who accessed the Internet through AT&T's 3G network.

Paul Fishman, the U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, and the FBI plan to hold a press conference Tuesday afternoon to discuss the charges."

A sexy iPad hack.

Femdom Cave - Adult Literature for the Discerning Reader
Read Controlling Sarah free at Literotica.Com

ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS
Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2011, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

Metro bag screenings: Of course there's no opting out

Assume the position.

Video of meeting below.
Metro bag screenings: Of course there's no opting out - @TBD On Foot | TBD.com:

"But when board member Diana Zinkl asked Taborn what would happen when someone opted out like this, here's what he said:

"Up against the wall!"

'Well I can tell you without any uncertainty that that person would be observed. And what that means to you is different than what it means to me, but that person would be observed.'

When Zinkl asked him to clarify the meaning of 'observed,' Taborn said,
'Be observed. Be, be observed. Be watched.' He later told board vice chair David Alpert that “[a]t some point in time, as we work with the FBI and as we work with the Department of Homeland Security, we establish why” a person declined the check.

In other words: If you don't fork over your bag, you're going to get a whole lot of attention from law enforcement. This is no big surprise. On the day these screenings were announced we asked Taborn if investigators would be following up with anyone who opted out. He told us 'there's always a possibility,' which we took to mean 'most certainly.'"

Femdom Cave - Adult Literature for the Discerning Reader
Read Controlling Sarah free at Literotica.Com

I love security theater!

ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS
Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2011, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

Geraldo Rivera says FBI Seduced Islamic Terrorists

Just heard about this:
Geraldo Rivera is adamant that the FBI seduces terrorists into terrorist acts!


What a weirdo! In the latest close-call, four of Mohamed Hussain's buddies did the right thing.  One did the best thing and reported Mohamed to the FBI. It does not look any different than when news people catch sexual predators and the potential victim is played by an adult actress. In this case, the potential victims were real and the weapon was impotent.
Criminal complaint.

Related story.


ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS
Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2010, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

Is Chief Moose Running the Pentagon/Marine Building Shooting Investigation?

A little more news and comment on the Pentagon/USMC Museum/Recruiting Office gunfire story.

The Mainstream Media, and possibly local cops & FBI want us to believe the latest terrorist is a disgruntled Marine or other service member.  Just like when Chief Moose had everybody looking for an angry white guy skinhead and CBSCNNMSNBC wanted us to look for an angry white tea party Obama hater responsible for the Times Square bombing attempt.

Shooter may be Marine, FBI says

Authorities said Friday that they think the shooter who has fired on three government buildings in the Washington area in recent days -- and may have shot, for a second time, at the National Museum of the Marine Corps overnight -- might be a U.S. Marine with a grievance against the Corps.

The shooter was urged to contact authorities during a Friday news conference at FBI offices downtown. "We'd like to know what his grievance is and how we can try to resolve it," said John Perren, acting assistant director for the FBI's Washington field office. "We'd like to hear his side of the story."

Now, there might be a healthy portion of journalistic license in that WaPo report, that could easily be cleared up by the FBI following up on their statement.  The FBI has not yet issued a press release for general consumption.

For starters, a large portion of the bomb-throwing Left hate all of our military, including the Marines.  What is at play here is a terrorist, not some Service Member with a gripe about their Tri-Care treatment.  Throwing the press a statement like 'someone with a grievance against the Marine Corps' sends their finger pointing straight to the military and away from MoveOn.


View Plotting the Shots in a larger map


ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS

John and Suki help Israel and her allies kick Iran's ass in the mid-2030s. Only $2.99 on Nook or Kindle. Also in paperback.

Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2010, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.

FBI Raids Suspected Terrorist Supporters in Chicago, Minneapolis

Straight out of the Marxist playbook of the 1960s and '70s, the anti-somethings swear they are just activists. They use the term "activist" like a Romulan cloaking device for whomever they are deciding to help. Another term they use, "anti-war", is incredibly deceptive. Typically they are not against war, they are on the other side.
(Arabic names added by me)

A good place to start on this story is from an AP dispatch from yesterday, with my comments added. Warning: This is quite long for a blog post.

MINNEAPOLIS — The FBI said it searched eight addresses in Minneapolis and Chicago as part of a terrorism investigation Friday. Warrants suggest agents were looking for connections between local anti-war activists and terrorist groups in Colombia and the Middle East.

FBI spokesman Steve Warfield (ستيڤ وارفيلد) told The Associated Press agents served six warrants in Minneapolis and two in Chicago.

"These were search warrants only," Warfield said. "We're not anticipating any arrests at this time. They're seeking evidence relating to activities concerning the material support of terrorism."

Sometimes this is called a "fishing expedition", especially by the supporters of these groups. In reality, the FBI probably had actionable evidence to justify the searches (noted farther down) and they were looking for more evidence.

The homes of longtime Minneapolis anti-war activists Mick Kelly (ميك كَلي), Jess Sundin (جَس سَندين) and Meredith Aby (مَرَديث ابي) were among those searched, they said. All three were subpoenaed to appear before a federal grand jury in Chicago: Aby on Oct. 5, Sundin on Oct. 12 and Kelly on Oct. 19.

"The FBI is harassing anti-war organizers and leaders, folks who opposed U.S. intervention in the Middle East and Latin America," Kelly said before agents confiscated his cell phone.

Probably the same thing Julius Kuhn would say if the FBI were looking into the German-American Bund in the 1930s. If he had a cell phone.

Sundin said she believes the searches are connected with the Minnesota Anti-War Committee's opposition to U.S. military aid to Colombia and Israel, as well as its opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"It's kind of outrageous that citizens of the United States could be targeted like this," Sundin said.

No, what is outrageous is that you have the notion that you can go assist any terrorist group you like and think that calling yourself by the right sham name gives you some sort of immunity.

In Chicago, the home of activists Joe Iosbaker (جو ايوسباكَر) and his wife, Stephanie Weiner (ستَفاني وَينَر), was searched by more than a dozen agents who carried out boxes full of their possessions — including their cell phones — and loaded them into a white van, the couple's attorney said.

Stepping outside his house briefly as FBI agents searched inside, Iosbaker was clearly shaken when he told The Associated Press: "I have done nothing wrong."

Helping terrorists is wrong, Joe. Seriously, if you want to help out then renounce your US citizenship and go to their country and help them there.

Their attorney, Melinda Power (مَليندا بووَر), said the warrant cited possible support, in her words, "for unnamed terrorist organizations." Iosbaker and Weiner were summoned to testify before a grand jury on Oct. 5.

"These are people committed to social justice," Power said. "That is not a crime in this country."

Codeword alert: "Social Justice" pretty much means other people have stuff and the way to get it is to steal it.  Being committed is not a crime here, this is true. If "Supporting Social Justice" ends up being a charge in court, I am with you on that one getting kicked out. I think they will get charged with something else.

As news of the raid spread around the neighborhood, friends and fellow activists gathered outside the house and several sang John Lennon's (جون لَنون), "Give Peace a Chance."

Not a rhyming chant writer among them! What sort of activist group is this anyway?

"These people have been activists all their lives," said Bob Hearst (بوب هيرست), who said he was a family friend. "I can't imagine why the FBI would have any interest in them."

I declare Bob Hearst the money quote winner of the article.

Warfield said he couldn't comment on whose homes were searched or give details on why because it was an ongoing investigation. "There's no imminent threat to the community," he said.

The Minneapolis searches were first reported by the Star Tribune.

The warrant for Kelly's home, provided by his attorney, sought evidence on travel he did as part of his work for the Freedom Road Socialist Organization and information on any travel to Colombia, the Palestinian territories, Jordan, Syria or Israel. The warrant for Sundin's home was similar but included a slightly different list of targeted groups.

Kelly's warrant also said agents sought information on contact with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Hezbollah. The U.S. government considers those three groups terrorist organizations.

There is a key. The US, where these people are operating from, has essentially declared the groups these people like helping "outlaws" and helping them lands you into trouble. It is not a difficult concept for normally functioning people to understand. Just because you think your bank robbing buddy you are hiding in your basement, or taking food to his hideout, is a good guy does not absolve you of assisting a wanted felon.  It really does not matter what you think of banks, bankers, capitalists or anything else.

"It appears to be a fishing expedition," said Kelly's attorney, Ted Dooley (تَد دولي). "It seems like they're casting a huge seine or net into the political sea and see what they can drag up on shore and dry out. There's no rhyme or reason to it in a free society."

It looks like they are fishing in the right spot.I do think that law has some overly broad passages and it does not look like anything overly broad was used here.  Kelly's attorney is pretty funny. If what he was saying was true a lot more than six warrants would have been served.

The federal law cited in the search warrant prohibits "providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations."

"I'm having a hard time paying my rent," Kelly said. "There is no material support."

Maybe if you didn't take such expensive trips paying rent might not be so hard.

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a free-speech challenge to the law from humanitarian aid groups that said some provisions put them at risk of being prosecuted for talking to terrorist organizations about nonviolent activities.

Two groups use the name Freedom Road Socialist Organization, one based in Chicago and one in New York. They split several years ago, and the New York group said it was not targeted.

Interesting how this "broad net" "fishing expedition" left alone an organization that split from the terrorist supporters.

The website for the Chicago group, which describes itself as a "revolutionary socialist and Marxist-Leninist organization," shows Kelly and Sundin have been affiliated with it. Kelly edits FightBack!, a Minneapolis-based website and newspaper for the group.

How can I take any "revolutionary" organization seriously if they suddenly were not doing anything "wrong" as soon as the cops show up?

Kelly's subpoena also commanded him to bring records he might have relating to the Middle East and Colombia, along with "all records of any payment provided directly or indirectly to Hatam Abudayyeh (هاتام ابودييَه)."

The subpoena did not further identify Abudayyeh, but FightBack has interviewed and carried articles by a Hatam Abudayyeh who's the executive director of the Chicago-based Arab American Action Network. Abudayyeh did not immediately return a phone message left at his office.

Kelly said he went to Lebanon two years ago for a Palestinian solidarity conference, and he's been on Colombian radio by phone from the U.S.

Sundin said she visited Colombia 10 years ago for a conference organized by a social movement there in opposition to U.S. military aid.

Aby said she went to Palestine in 2002 and Colombia in 2004 and 2006 to meet with activists. She said anyone who's an activist in those counties gets labeled as a terrorist.

Just a wild guess here, they probably traveled more often and under different names than the ones given here in the AP story.

Both Sundin and Kelly were organizers of a mass march on the first day of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul two years ago, and recently appeared at a news conference to announce plans for another protest if Minneapolis is selected to hold the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

Finally, there is something mentioned in this article that they did that was perfectly fine and legal.

Police estimated the peaceful march in 2008 drew 10,000 protesters; organizers put the figure at 30,000. Other protests were marked by destructive acts by anarchists. More than 800 people were arrested during the four days of the convention, including Sundin and Kelly.

I spoke too soon.

Other Minnesota anti-war activists whose homes were searched included Anh Pham (انه بهم), Sarah Martin (ساراه مارتين) and Tracy Molm (ترَيسي مولم), Dooley said. He said he didn't know whose homes were searched in Chicago.

The FBI's spokesman in Chicago, Ross Rice (روس رايس), would only say two searches were conducted Friday in Chicago and there were no arrests.

No arrests, yet.

Asked about the reports, the U.S. Attorney's office spokesman in Chicago, Randy Samborn (راندي سامبورن), confirmed warrants were served in the city "in connection with a law enforcement investigation." He also declined to provide details.

Associated Press Writers Michael Tarm (ميخائيل تارم) in Chicago and Martiga Lohn (مارتيغا لون) in Minneapolis contributed to this report.

Prediction: If charges are brought against this bunch, they will claim to be "political prisoners" just like Sirhan Sirhan (سيرهان سيرهان) was tagged by Bill Ayers (بيل يَرس) in a book dedication.

Zombie writes:

In my exposé, I highlighted what I thought were the most noteworthy aspects of Prairie Fire, including the part where Ayers brags about and then lists in detail the numerous terrorist bombings he carried out in the 1970s; where he describes himself as a communist, and cites his desire for a communist revolution to overthrow the United States; where he cites the many motivations driving the Weather Underground’s terror campaign, most of which had nothing whatsoever to do with the Vietnam War (as the media endlessly claims to this day); and so on. I also listed the many close links between Ayers and Obama.

Almost as an aside, I pointed out halfway through the report an absurd detail that I noticed by accident when scanning one of the book’s pages — that Ayers and his co-authors had dedicated Prairie Fire to (among dozens of lesser known criminals and radicals) Sirhan Sirhan, the assassin who killed Robert F. Kennedy (روبَرت ف. كَنَدي).

I am including that passage as a companion to the article above. Bill Ayers and the people who were served warrants by the FBI in the first story are of the delusional mindset that they can do whatever they want and their actions should have no consequences against them.  Maybe the people in the AP story were not actually throwing bombs. However, any support given to terrorist groups only serves to strengthen them.



ORDER SUKI SERIES eBOOKS AND PAPERBACKS

Suki IV: Finally A Vacation (War With Iran) only $2.99 on Kindle

Suki Series Tech
Order the paperback edition of Suki V: The Collection
Browse the series on Google: Suki I, Suki II, Suki III, Suki IV, Suki V
Fan Fiction: John and Suki: Vacation Fun
John and Suki's news and comment area, from a Libertarian perspective.
Copyright 1970 - 2010, SJE Enterprises, all rights reserved.